I happened to stumble across one of those cheesy period detective dramas the other day, well, the wife was watching it when I walked in to the room.
“It’s your fault I was fired from my job!” One woman screamed manically at a crowd of people in a marquee.
“Well you shouldn’t have published trashy articles about us.” Replied one of the people the woman had been spitting venom at.
‘What on earth is going on?’ I thought to myself.
After watching for a few minutes it all came clear.
The woman was a journalist who was forced to write sensationalist articles about the wealthy socialites of the 1950s.
It wasn’t a job that she particularly enjoyed, but she needed to put food on the table.
Her husband had been killed in the war and she was left holding the baby and so to earn much needed money, she wrote about people who were easy targets, the people society were obsessed about… the wealthy upper classes.
People love to read about scandal, just look at the recent coverage of the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard court case. It doesn’t interest me, but a lot of people love that stuff.
Back in the 1950s where class was everything and people had to be seen doing ‘the correct and proper thing’, scandalous behaviour was big news.
This journalist would follow the socialites and the elite to clubs and parties recording everything remotely scandalous she observed which was then published in one of the big national papers.
And as we know, papers don’t always print the truth. They sensationally imply things that are not actually real.
A man and a woman walking into a room together at a party simply chatting and laughing could be published in the papers the next day as a ‘scandalous affair’.
The problem with attacking the socialites is that the people who own newspapers are also part of the elite group and they very often know each other or move in the same circles.
It turned out that one of the people she wrote about had an uncle who had powerful connections with the paper who then applied a little pressure resulting with the woman being fired.
The scene that I walked into was several months later where she was working as a struggling unemployed journalist trying to sell stories to whichever paper would buy them.
She had followed the crowd to a fashion show they were putting on and start hurling abuse at them.
While raging at the people she asked certain individuals questions which hinted at her knowing secrets they didn’t want made public.
As I’m sure you can imagine it wasn’t long after her tirade that she was found dead.
She had been bludgeoned to death with her own typewriter.
There’s poetical justice for you!
What interested me was the fact that she ‘blamed’ others for the fact that she got sacked when really it was all her own doing.
I appreciate that she needed to earn money to put food on the table and that the 1950s didn’t have the same opportunities that we do today, but she actively published stories about people which were factually incorrect.
Stories which had damaging consequences to the lives of those people.
Stories which forced people to respond.
Okay, murder might be a bit of an extreme response… but she caused her own demise by constantly attacking people who had no original grievance with her.
She published their secrets which they didn’t want making public. These were personal secrets which the public had no need knowing.
A wealthy landowner with huge debts who was about to be declared bankrupt is of no concern to Mable at no 47, Chichester Walk, Rampton.
Gladys at 23, Lincoln Walk, Wragby doesn’t need to know whether Lady Felicia had a drunken fling with her gardener on New Year’s Eve.
When you do something which targets other people and brings attention to them that they do not need and hadn’t personally asked for, there will always be repercussions.
Okay… you might be wondering why I am telling you all of this…
Scroll down to carry on reading…
FREE Digital Copy - No Cost to You...
OVER 30,000 COPIES SOLD AT £19.95!
To claim your FREE COPY, simply complete your details below and hit the submit button!
Send For Your FREE Copy Now!
I guess the motivation for this email is from the book Secrets of the Millionaire Mind by T. Harv Eker which I am currently re-reading.
It talks a lot about personal responsibility and how we all are responsible for what happens in our lives.
He made a great point when he said that you never see a rich victim.
The reason for that is that wealthy and rich people don’t have a victim mindset. They never play the victim whereas poor people do.
Poor people complain, blame and justify their issues on external forces such as other people.
In the same way the female journalist blamed her losing her job on the socialites and not because she constantly stalked and unnecessarily publicly ‘outed’ their secrets… or in many cases non-secrets as there were no truth to many of her stories.
There is a big difference between how wealthy people think and how poor people think.
The good news is that the difference is not hereditary.
People are not necessarily born with a millionaire mindset or a poverty mindset – some people may be more biologically inclined than others – it is mostly programming from what you experienced and heard around you in your formative years.
You learn what you think.
Your thinking patterns and behaviour is down to the information you have stored in your brain.
To change your thinking from one of poverty to one of prosperity and wealth, all you need to do is remove old information and replace it with new.
The other day I shared with you the story how one of our team thought that people who gambled only ever lost money in the long run… that was until he met people who were making thousands of pounds each month trading sports like football and horseracing.
His original thinking was learned from what he had been repeatedly told by his peers.
He has since changed that old thinking pattern for one which suits him better.
Gambling is just one of many ways that people can make money today.
Unlike the female journalist forced to ruin people’s lives writing sensationalised stories, we can make money from the comfort of our own homes without having to deal with anyone… or upset people.
Our good friend Roy earned more money in one year, £47,000 in fact, using a gambling system than he did from full time employment.
His system – which he got the idea for after watching Superman III, I kid you not – takes no more than an hour to work.
Six hours using his gambling system each week resulted in more money than working 40 hours a week.
Roy makes around £903 each week which is why he named his system System 903.
The money Roy makes is completely TAX FREE too.
Roy wanted to share his system with others and so he wrote it all out in a step-by-step manual and instructed us to publish it on his behalf.
He also instructed us to sell only 250 copies, so if you want your own copy of the system which makes him £903 each week in TAX FREE profits click the link below:
System 903
Kind Regards
John Harrison
PS… Please note; no more copies will be printed after the last one has been sold. Once they’re gone, they’re gone.
Here’s that link again: